pho[to]rum

Vous n'êtes pas identifié.

#1 2024-12-16 19:39:42

KinaLammon
New member
Lieu: United States, Sugar Land
Date d'inscription: 2024-12-16
Messages: 1
Site web

Occupational Safety And Health Administration

Creating malicious software program that may assault Apple Mac computers is "trivial", a leading safety researcher has claimed. Patrick Wardle, from safety firm Synack, demonstrated a number of new kinds of malicious software program that bypassed Apple's safety measures. In one instance, Apple's own iCloud service may control an assault. The threats are identified to Apple, Mr Wardle stated, however the company has not yet commented on the research. Mr Wardle was talking at Black Hat 2015, an annual gathering of hackers and security professionals held in Las Vegas. He commended the corporate's efforts in working with him to make the platform more safe, saying that the Cupertino-primarily based agency "acquired safety". But he argued that Apple's increased recognition means it is attracting further consideration from cybercriminals who would generally deal with attacking computer systems running Microsoft's Windows. While Windows remains to be overwhelmingly attackers' platform of alternative, antivirus firm Kaspersky Labs recorded a surge in Apple malware up to now couple of years. Among them, iWorm and WireLurker - the latter gaining plenty of media attention. The attacks he detailed have been way more hidden than anything that had been found so far. Some components of the vulnerabilities he and different researchers have found have been found "within the wild", he said, the time period given to threats being exploited on real customers. Mr Wardle's research targeted considerably on one piece of Apple software program often known as Gatekeeper. It is a program which warns the consumer when they are opening a file that is not from a "trusted" source. Its default setting is to solely allow applications downloaded from Apple's App Store and trusted third-celebration builders. But his methods demonstrated a method of circumventing this protection, utilizing "dynamic libraries" to inject malicious code into trusted programs. Mr Wardle had sturdy criticisms of Apple's built in antivirus program, XProtect. The software program, which detects and blocks identified malware, warning the user in the process, might be tricked by primarily renaming the malware. The researcher additionally examined various different paid antivirus products available on the market, and concluded that they endure comparable problems as XProtect. In a single case, he famous that some antivirus applications consider Apple's iCloud system - the online storage service it offers all customers of its merchandise - to be a "trusted" supply. This implies Mr Wardle was in a position to use iCloud to host an assault's Command and Control server, the a part of an attack that controls the malware's operation. Implicit belief of iCloud servers is a problem. Mr Wardle to the BBC. Mr Wardle famous that Apple has been receptive to his research up to now, but that the methods he described had been still vulnerable. He has created free software - referred to as Objective-See - to address the problems he outlined. A request from the BBC to Apple has gone unanswered on the time of publication. The problem is, in some circumstances their patches are inadequate, so I can bypass the patch. Concluding his speak, Mr Wardle said his work was motivated by a love for Apple and its products. Cellan-Jones: Why ban WhatsApp?


Occupational Safety And Health Administration - aviator

Hors ligne

 

Pied de page des forums

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson