DeepSeek (Chinese: ____; pinyin: Sh_ndù Qiúsu_) is a Chinese expert system business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.


The DeepSeek-R1 design offers reactions similar to other contemporary large language designs, such as OpenAI's GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI's GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek's AI designs were developed amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these two countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia's share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek's success versus larger and more established competitors has actually been described as "upending AI", [8] making up "the first chance at what is emerging as a global AI space race", [11] and ushering in "a new age of AI brinkmanship". [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be freely offered for usage, modification, viewing, and designing files for constructing functions. [13] The company supposedly vigorously recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs' understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is easily available for use, adjustment, and viewing. This includes authorization to access and utilize the source code, as well as style documents, for constructing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence lab devoted to research study establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer's financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were unwilling in providing funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short time period. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek became known as the catalyst for China's AI model price war. It was quickly dubbed the "Pinduoduo of AI", and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the price of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research and has no comprehensive plans for commercialization; [20] this also permits its technology to prevent the most stringent provisions of China's AI regulations, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government's controls on info. [3]

DeepSeek's working with preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in a lot of brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people without any computer system science background to help its innovation understand other subjects and knowledge locations, consisting of being able to generate poetry and carry out well on the infamously tough Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history


DeepSeek LLM


On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available totally free to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract ("DeepSeek license") relating to "open and responsible downstream usage" for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct models.


They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was released). It was developed to contend with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base models was likewise released simultaneously, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with "shared professionals" that are constantly queried, and "routed professionals" that might not be. They found this to assist with skilled balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can end up being excessively relied on, while other professionals might be hardly ever utilized, losing parameters. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are similarly used then triggers specialists to reproduce the exact same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to learn core capabilities that are often utilized, and let the routed experts to learn the peripheral capacities that are rarely used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions "related to GSM8K and MATH". The benefit design was continually updated during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.


V2


In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The first phase was trained to fix mathematics and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be useful, safe, and follow rules. This phase used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety benefit models were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit model was by hand set. All skilled reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.


They went with 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had "special qualities" various from RL on general data. For example, RL on reasoning might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and trained similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help "more research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE". [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of experts (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab's leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then integrated with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was produced by a reward model trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.


DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3


In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the exact same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning information was produced by "skilled models". Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. - The "professional models" were trained by starting with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and confirm throughout thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
- Each expert model was trained to create simply synthetic thinking information in one particular domain (math, shows, logic).
- Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered "overthinking, bad format, and extreme length".




4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data consisting of both final reward and chain-of-thought causing the final reward. The benefit design produced reward signals for both concerns with unbiased but free-form responses, and concerns without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programs issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.


The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to achieve efficiency. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM regimens to accumulate precisely. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact machine each professional was on in order to prevent specific machines being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1


On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible by means of DeepSeek's API, in addition to by means of a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it surpassed performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also released some "DeepSeek-R1-Distill" models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data created by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first believes about the reasoning process in the mind and after that offers the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here respond to here. User:. Assistant:


DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, "generally" of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed response is right (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the design puts its thinking trace within ... [47]

As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these concerns and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on "thousands" of "cold-start" information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, but likewise with a "language consistency reward" to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the created thinking had a wrong last answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.


Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses


DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to questions, solves reasoning issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world's leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek's competitive performance at relatively minimal cost has been recognized as possibly challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a "Sputnik minute" for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was supposedly "on par with" among OpenAI's latest designs when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as "AI's Sputnik minute". [51]

DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly praised DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China's Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with specialists and asked him to offer viewpoints and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek's optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China's AI development, that include export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business's AI designs as a result "sparked market chaos" [57] and caused shares in major international innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia's stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google's owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had actually caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek's success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed "Stargate Project" to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek "extremely remarkable". [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed apprehension of the app's efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a "massive" cyberattack interfered with the appropriate functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application programming interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, uses censorship systems for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For example, the design refuses to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially create an answer, but then deletes it shortly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: "Sorry, that's beyond my existing scope. Let's speak about something else." [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be removed to a minimal extent in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the "core socialist values" defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek's R1 explained Taiwan as "an inalienable part of China's territory," and stated: "We securely oppose any kind of 'Taiwan self-reliance' separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways." [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into providing certain responses to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy


Some specialists fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek's personal privacy terms and conditions say "We store the info we collect in safe servers found in individuals's Republic of China ... We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our model and Services". Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT's personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian information defense authority is looking for extra info on DeepSeek's collection and usage of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan's government prohibited using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea's Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek's use of personal info. [83]

Expert system market in China.


Notes


^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required choosing "Deep Think enabled", and every user could use it only 50 times a day.
References


^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). "China's cheap, open AI design DeepSeek thrills researchers". Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). "The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow". The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). "How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants". The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek's cheaper models and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending". Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). "Biden admin's cap on GPU exports may strike India's AI ambitions". The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). "Nvidia examination signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly". Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). "Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe". BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). "China's DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here's what you should know". CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?". CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). "Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants". ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). "Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I." The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). "ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta's LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key". Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). "How a leading Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). "Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker". ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). "Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I." CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023)." [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won't Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says". Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). "Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). "The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). "Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China's AI Race". ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder". GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming - The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ "DeepSeek Coder". deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ "deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face". huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main". huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary". huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face". huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main". huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). "Chinese start-up DeepSeek's new AI design outperforms Meta, OpenAI products". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). "DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch". VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). "DeepSeek's new AI model seems among the very best 'open' challengers yet". TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ "Deepseek Log in page". DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ "News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!". DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). "DeepSeek's first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). "Don't Look Now, but China's AI Is Catching Up Fast". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce". GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ "Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store". Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). "American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute". The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). "' Sputnik minute': $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot" - through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). "Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets". BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ "DeepSeek presents a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley". The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). "Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says". Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ ____ (22 January 2025). "______________________ _ _____" AI____"". finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). "Chinese AI business's AI design breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions". Tom's Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "DeepSeek updates - Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia". BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). "Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap". Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek stimulates global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth". Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). "DeepSeek, Calling It 'Impressive' however Staying Skeptical". Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). "Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek's open-source AI as "extremely outstanding": "We need to take the advancements out of China extremely, really seriously"". Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). "OpenAI's Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model 'remarkable'". The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). "Trump calls China's DeepSeek AI app a 'wake-up call' after tech stocks slide". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). "Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development "positive"". Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). "China's A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street" - via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). "Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek's interruption". Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Elon Musk 'concerns' DeepSeek's claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities". Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. "Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs". Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek struck with 'massive' cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. "DeepSeek momentarily limited new sign-ups, citing 'massive destructive attacks'". Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). "Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic - and it doesn't appreciate totally free speech". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot". Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). "We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ "The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of turmoil". The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). "Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its 'Sputnik moment'". NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). "China's DeepSeek AI presents formidable cyber, information personal privacy dangers". Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). "Experts prompt care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). "DeepSeek's success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back". LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Privacy policy". Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek's Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data protection". Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). "White House evaluates impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states". Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.