For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.


"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.


Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.


It's an interesting read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.


It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.


Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.


There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.


There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.


When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.


A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses _ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.


I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.


There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".


Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.


He hopes to broaden his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.


It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.


Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.


"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.


"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."


In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.


"I do not think using generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it ethically and relatively."


OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps


DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking


China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger


In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.


The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.


Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".


He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.


"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.


Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.


"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.


"The federal government is weakening among its best carrying out markets on the vague promise of development."


A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."


Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.


In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.


In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.


But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.


This comes as a number of lawsuits against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.


They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.


The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.


If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.


DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.


As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.


But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.


Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.


Outside the UK? Sign up here.